Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Tutor Experience
Monday, May 3, 2010
end of semester
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Final Story
Why I Want To Work at the Writing Center Essay
Research Paper
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Portfolio
Lab Practical
natasha tretheway
Monday, April 26, 2010
Siena Fest reflection
Siena Fest
Sunday, April 25, 2010
I was also really excited for SienaFest, but it was a let down. It wasn’t fair that the rules were so strict. Looking ahead to this week, now, I am a little nervous for my first consultation in the writing center. It is going to be a strange experience having another student trust me with their work. I just hope that I’m able to keep the things that we learned in class in mind during the session. With this I think it will go alright.
After Siena Fest, Back To Work
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Catholic Traditions Paper
First Day of Springs Fest
Friday, April 23, 2010
Now that you are so knowledgeable about the WC, I'm interested in hearing about new initiatives and activities that we can work on developing next year. FYI - We created a blog for the WC (though we haven't used it yet). Hopefully you'll be up for continuing such conversations . . .
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Peer Review in Foundations Class
Today in my Foundations class we had our first peer review since I have been in Writing 240. I immediately noticed that I was using tutoring strategies that we have learned in class. I was taking notes, and checking to make sure everything was working to prove the person’s thesis statement. During this I realized tutoring can be somewhat tough. The fact that the person was reading through their essay very quickly did not help, but it was kind of tough to keep track of everything while trying to jot little notes down. I assume like anything, with practice it will get easier, but I am just worried about my first few tutoring sessions and not being a very good tutor. Hopefully when I do my first session it is a little bit easier than this one.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Stereotype
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
3rd Writing Center Observation
"Fix-Up Shop"
Monday, April 19, 2010
Writing centers are to fix my grammar
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Confusion
Friday, April 9, 2010
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Major observation differences!
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
End of the semester?
Monday, April 5, 2010
Liz Funk Thoughts...
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Liz Funk
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Today's Class
grow up?
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Response To North's Essay
Andrew Fleming
WRIT240—Professor Liptak
Response Paper “Idea of a Writing Center” by Stephen North
Stephen M. North’s “The Idea of a Writing Center” was a very enlightening read for me. I think the primary reason I found it so compelling was the fact that it dismissed many misconceptions I had about writing centers and their purposes. I was always under the impression that writing centers were supposed to serve as a place to get your papers “corrected”. North clearly becomes infuriated anytime he hears of a writing center being equated to this sort of “fix-up” shop for writers. Rather, North asks, even implores, his audience to view writing centers as “an institutional response to all writers’ need for a personal auditor—a teacher, a classmate, a roommate, an editor—who would not only listen but draw them out, ask them questions they would not think to ask themselves.”
After reading this essay, I wholeheartedly agree with North’s philosophy about writing centers. In my eyes, it is not a writing center’s job to simply pick papers apart with red pens, and then call the next innocent student in for the “slaughter”. This approach often leaves writers disheartened and unmotivated, and it fails to promote growth. Instead, it simply defines the “rules and regulations” of writing, and points out a writer’s failures to adhere the curriculum.
Rather, I, like North, feel that writing centers should assist writers in their personal writing processes. By having a tutor ask questions, the writer may find new direction and inspiration. Also, this method allows for writers to feel more engaged in their personal writing and editing process. It is a far more constructive approach to writing as a process, and encourages writers to utilize writing centers through positive inducement, rather than negative inducement.
However, even this approach has its flaws. These flaws can be attributed to what I feel is a “totalitarian” mentality that is not restricted just to English, but is interdisciplinary. That is, that even in the “open-minded” environment one finds in a writing center, the ideas and thoughts generated in an effort to foster a writer’s work will be dominated by the “rules and regulations” of institutional English. For example, a writer may bring an essay assignment to a tutor at the writing center. While that tutor may help the writer under the conventions of North’s “new writing center” philosophy, the assistance they provide that writer will be adhering to guidelines that will satisfy the requirements of a given curriculum. It is my belief that, inevitably, most tutors will give advice that will improve a writer’s chances of receiving a “good grade”, whether they are conscious of it or not.
WRIT240
Reading in class yesterday...
I was really nervous that it was not good enough to be sent out, however, I think that reading it to my peers was very helpful in realizing my potential! I may be rejected a few times from the big publishing companies, but it was nice to have a group of people willing to listen. I hope that with your edits my paper will improve and stand a better chance at being published!
Thanks again!
Writing Center
Either way, it was a very short session because there was little to correct on the paper. During my last session, I observed Mike; he was able to make helpful suggestions about the writer's analysis and word choice, however, with the type of paper the writer brought in for this session, I don't believe there was really much advice to give.
The tutor explained how not to repeat certain adjectives and nouns, but other than that, there was little else to the session. Other than the issues my tutor covered with the student, I wasn't able to think of anything else that should have been touched upon. The student kept explaining that the numerous points she had in the paper needed to be covered in the three pages, so there was little room for expansion; it seemed the student had expanded every way possible without going over her page limit. It was a strange paper to edit, because, other than mistakes in grammar and word choice, there was little structure to the paper because it was so fact based.
I was wondering if the Writing Center gets a lot of papers like this. I assume that there is always something to correct on a persons paper, as there was with this one, however, with such little information to work with and absolutely no analysis, I could see how this type of setting would be difficult for a tutor.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Liz Funk
Monday, March 15, 2010
Liz Funk
Late Comment on Janisse Ray
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Indecision
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Liptak finally contributes
I've been reading and commenting on the first set of papers that were submitted early last week. I'm trying something new this semester, and I'm a little nervous. Not because I lack confidence in the results, but rather because I'm not sure how it's going to be received by the class. I am going to refrain from giving the students a grade on such "high stakes" writing assignments, and at the end of the semester, I will ask the students to resubmit the originals (with my comments and feedback) along with significant revisions, and then I will assign a grade accordingly. In essence, the students will be asked to submit a portfolio, which will receive one grade.
Hopefully along with my narrative comments, the students should have some ideas about revising their essays. I am hoping that such an evaluation system will encourage students to focus more on revisiting and improving their pieces, rather than on their grades. Yes, there ultimately will be a grade - it's hard to escape that - but for now, I hope that some pressure is relieved and that this will positively benefit the students' writing by giving them more freedom to take risks . . .
On my end, this is actually quite a bit more work. It already takes me approximately 45 to 60 minutes to read and respond to one draft. Because I'm not giving a grade, I feel as if my narrative feedback has to be extensive . . . Maybe individual conferences will be more practical the next time around. We'll see.
I hope that some of the students comment on this post, for I'd like to get feedback on my proposed evaluation system.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Friday, March 5, 2010
Thursday, March 4, 2010
class today
writing process
Monday, March 1, 2010
writing process
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Class Today
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Writing Process
One thing WRIT240 has begun to show me is the importance of the pre-writing stage. I've never been one to voluntarily write rough drafts, make outlines, or mind map. Rather, I usually sit down at my computer the night before an assignment is due, and make it up as I go. However, as we have edited each others papers so far, I have started to realize that a little pre-writing goes a long way.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Cupelo Lit. Bio- Words
I don’t remember when I first started reading, just that I always was told that it was important. I do remember sitting on the couch with my mom and my little sister, Caroline, as I struggled to pronounce the words that meant nothing to me. Needless to say, Caroline learned how to read before I did. I remember being more interested in the colorful pastel pictures than the actual story that I didn’t really understand. I had no idea that the words I glanced over would become a huge part of who I am.
Since those early days on the couch with my mom I have become an avid reader. I can still remember the rhyme in one of my favorite children’s book entitled Forever For Always. I enjoy reading a wide variety of genres and have that typical obsessive-compulsive tendency to be physically unable to put down a book until I finish. I read the seventh Harry Potter book in one day, with an hour to spare, and won a dollar for beating my older sister, Emily. I loved Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and was devastated when my dad told me that the over a thousand-page book I had read was only the abridged version. To this day, George Orwell’s 1984 and Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird are my two favorite books; followed closely by J.D Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye. I am terrible at writing formal essays, but when assigned to do so on these books, they were the easiest A’s I have ever received. To me, books are just like movie scripts. The writer provides the set, misleading plot, the twisted characters, the action and imagery; all you have to do is close your eyes. Most movies are based off books anyways. Ever notice how similar the movie V for Vendetta is to 1984?
I don’t think that there is such a thing as an original idea. Emily used to keep a journal filled with movie lines, song lyrics and quotes said by famous people in history. I used to stow away into her room and read through the notebook full of the
same clichés that were simply said in a different style surrounded by varying adjectives. I didn’t even care that I was going to get in trouble for sneaking into Emily’s room. I couldn’t help myself. I loved that there were so many different ways to express ones self, so many words at my disposal that carry such weight. I find that this weight is like a catapult, once we cut the rope the shear power is released and even though we may not see where the boulder lands, damaged may have still been caused. Sometimes, we don’t think, but a simple thank you can make all the change a person’s life. Eventually, Emily started locking her door as to stop me from stealing her books, but I foiled her plan by learning how to pick her lock using a clothes hanger. Fed up with my annoying intrusions, Emily told me to stop reading her notebook and to just try writing on my own. I wrote a poem about memories entitled “Memories.” I knew that it was a subject that was very overdone, but I figured the real writers, who are older than me, already took all the good ideas. It was then that I concluded that there is no way I can come up with an original idea, my only choice is to put my own spin on an old theme. Just like all the people Emily had quoted in her journal. After nervously watching Emily decipher my poor handwriting I was told to never stop writing. Which is why, now, when I get in trouble for writing in class I simply respond that I am only doing what I was instructed all those years ago.
When I first started writing, the style that truly captivated me was poetry. I saw poetry as the best way to transform a common idea, and make it into something different by surrounding it with detailed imagery and elaborate metaphors for my readers to discern. When we started to learn about the components of poetry in school, my enthusiasm was usually matched by groans made by my peers. They saw poetry as something that is written to make readers’ brains hurt. I saw it as the most intriguing puzzle ever! It does not, as stereotypically thought, require a rhyme scheme; there are hidden symbols knitted into the piece; the form in which the poem is presented adds all the more to the visual aspect of the overall poem; the metaphors and similes are proof of the writer’s pure creativity and ability to see things in a different light. The connotation of each word must be balanced before
even being considered, as its power can determine the direction the piece will take after being interpreted by the reader. You are only given a few lines to write in, but so much can be done. Even a voice can be heard. In my eighteen years of reading, I had found that in each book I read, the speaker has an audible voice throughout the entire work just by the words he chooses to say. That’s what appeals to me most, the writer’s ability to express his or her voice through the words that he or she writes.
I easily classify myself as someone who is quite quiet, so my voice is not something that bounces off people’s ear drums that often. I understand that public speaking is a common Achilles heel, but it’s more so for me than anyone I know. My fingers will writhe in my hands, my pulse flares into a dangerous range as my legs begin to bounce under the table as I attempt to release the nervous energy and my head is kept down. I just find that words come to me easier when I’m forming them with ink. When I’m writing I can make the conversation go in any direction I choose. I can get my point across with no one interrupting me. When I am writing, I know am guaranteed to be heard, even if it’s just by the sheets of paper in my notebook. With so much going through my head, sometimes I just have to get things out. Whether it comes to you after much contemplation or during a daydream. Even if it means getting in trouble for writing during class, it would seem that my love for writing as a cathartic release is more appropriately described as an addiction like that of a alcoholic. It’s bittersweet in that I love the feeling of an accomplished piece but it burns as I realize that there is so much editing to be done and I am left itching to exercise my wrist again.
Last year in my creative writing class, I was able to spin my wrist in other directions than just poetry. I was taught different types of poetry such as villanelles, sonnets and slam poetry. We focused on sound imagery and form. We also tried our hands at one-act plays and short stories. We also kept a journal in which we wrote freeform in each class. I loved it all. I didn’t even care that I had to present every piece I wrote. I didn’t care because it gave me a chance to speak. To show people that I’m not just some kid who wastes class time writing in a spiral green notebook.
My one-act play entitled “She Said Yes…” was in the top six in a competition we were forced to submit to, and my villanelle won honorable mention in a contest. My
teacher, Mr. Benware, and my friends constantly told me that I have talent, but it fell upon deaf ears. I do not like to boast about my pieces because whatever complimentary attributes they are given, I know I am not yet a writer. I still have so much to learn, and I know that being at Siena College is going to get me one step closer to that admirable title. My grammar is still not exemplary and my mom still complains about my poor handwriting. This however is not going to put a damper on my writing. I like to think that my ideas and twists on normalcy are something worth reading. I like to think that my perspective is worth reading and discussing. I do not have a special delegated ballpoint pen, nor do I have a really cool retro quill that’s reserved for writing in some special secret notebook. I do however have numerous pens and a pencil in my backpack ready to be used. There is something about holding a pen in my hand when I write the letters that form the words in my head. There’s a kind of old-fashioned satisfaction that adds to the experience that just makes my scribbles worth etching.
Now that I am at Siena, it has become more difficult to find time to write, especially by hand. So, I have begun writing a journal type of document on my laptop that is filled of my observations, memories and random thoughts. The document is entitled Contemplations of an Emo Kid: “the so-called problems of an angst-ridden teenager from middle-class nowhere.” I am fully aware that I am not emo, however, I just like the title and I think that emo is a funny word because it reminds me of the word emu, and emus are funny. This type of thought process is the epitome of my random writing style and evidence of my tendency to lose focus in essays, but everyone has their strengths and weaknesses.
My weakness is formal essays. Like most people, I am terrible at writing formal essays. I find them restricting in their structure, and confusing. It’s more like expanding on a checklist. You must ensure that you hit certain points with enough information to support what you say. There is little to no room for your own personal style, let alone your voice. Recently, I have begun free writing before I
delve into my essay so as to get my thoughts in order, and this process has helped me improve my amateur essay skills. I am often frustrated that there is an imbalance between my ability to write formally and creatively. Life can’t give you everything though. Some people are good at focused essays; some people have short attention spans.
Life has given me an adoration of writing though. That obsessive-compulsive tendency I have for reading has transformed into an obsession of writing. A skill in which I plan to enhance as I continue learning from professors in college, the books I read, and the critique of my peers. So, let me apologize in advance if I write during a class, presentation, or while you are speaking. Please understand that I am merely following Emily’s order to never stop writing. Who am I do deny such a request?
Monday, February 15, 2010
Exemplary Parents and Inferior Teachers
When I was young, my parents often reminded me that I should not worry about other people’s opinions, unless they were trying to help me. This meant that I should not care if someone did not like the form of my jump shot in basketball, my pitching wind-up in baseball, or even my style of writing. When I found success in something doing it my own way, then there was no reason to change it. Not everything has to be done the conventional way, I was taught. If this support had been matched by more of my teachers growing up, then I would have entered Siena College as a far more confident reader and writer. The truth is that my teachers in middle and high school, perhaps the most crucial years for a student, did not help me improve my skills through instruction and positive criticism, but shed a negative light on each that has set me back in the long run. This was until I graduated from high school and made it into college. Taking college classes and being taught by professors who value the progress made by their students has brought literacy back into my daily life.
The home environment in which I grew up should have, in retrospect, guaranteed me a future as someone with a great understanding and love of the English language. My father graduated from college with a degree in English, and my mother did the same a few years later. Neither of them went on to careers that were primarily focused in reading or writing, but they truly loved the English language. I asked my parents just a few years ago if they had hoped that my brother and I would share this interest with them; both said yes. I had to know that this would be the answer—at least I should have. My mom is a stickler for proper grammar. She consistently critiques letters, emails, and general conversation. More of a Patricia O’Connor type, my mom never speaks out to be hurtful, but is just an honest and helpful person who enjoys the English language in the way it was intended. As a young kid my mom taught me how to properly carry on a conversation. Listening to me speak, one would never hear mistakes like, “me and Chris are leaving,” or “I’m doing good.” Errors like these have set off an alarm within me since I was very young, before I even knew why, thanks only to my mother. My dad was never the type to correct me, yet he expressed his desire for me to share his passion for English in his own way.
Every night before bed my dad asked if I wanted to listen to him read a book. To be honest, I do not remember when this tradition started, but I do know that it went on a very long time. The Hardy Boys and The Happy Hollisters were our two favorite series. Sometime during these years began my love of reading, or at least hearing my dad read to me. My dad loved to share one story in particular from when I was in preschool. We were going to have a “father-son” day. My request, out of anything in the world, was to go for a hike and find a spot to read. The day was perfect; a clear blue sky without a cloud in sight, the rushing water of the Susquehanna River smashing against the rocks beside us, and the distinct smell of the air after a long rain when the sun comes out and shines. We sat on the damp, moss covered rock of my choice, and read. At some point during the story, my dad noticed that I was not looking at either him or the book, so he asked me what was going on in the story. I went on to give, as he told it, a ten minute summary of the last few chapters of the book up until his last few words. This, in my mind, must have been around the time I started to love literature. I began feeling not only the satisfaction gained from a good book, but the undeniable pleasure of parents’ true approval. Everyone knows that their parents love them, but there is something different about the look they give you when you truly impress them.
Going to school should have obviously strengthened my reading and writing skills, and this is what happened in elementary school. I can remember reading out loud for the first time to my classmates in Mrs. Sosa’s first grade class, my first report in third grade—the reason why I am still an authority on leopard seals, and being one of two people to read an essay aloud to the entire student body in sixth grade entitled “My Seven Years at Center Street Elementary.” The most important part of these years was that I had teachers who saw potential in me, like my parents had, and pushed me to succeed. I continued to love this feeling of being recognized, just like my parents had made me feel at home. This was something that I became accustomed to and did not think that anything would ever change when I moved up to Oneonta Middle School. Nothing played out the way I expected.
I was a strong reader and a confident writer moving on to OMS. Ms. Drago’s favorite quote in sixth grade was, “middle school will prepare you for the crucial four years of high school.” This is not what happened. I had average grades in elementary school, so in middle school was placed into the regular classes. Surely these teachers were expected by their superiors to provide the best education possible to the students in all of their classes, but it is clear looking back now that they did not. I did not understand why they did not share the enthusiasm of my parents and earlier teachers. They did not have the confidence that those before had in me, and left me lacking the advantages of positive criticism or worthwhile approval. Seventh and eighth grade consisted of the students messing around constantly while teachers let it happen. Looking back on these days I regret so much that I did not take the initiative outside of school to read or practice any form of writing. I was definitely not doing what my parents had hoped I would. If only my teachers shared the same feelings. I believe today that the expectations of my teachers were being fulfilled because they did not expect anything more from me than the mediocre work that I handed in and the rude attitude that I displayed. This may sound harsh, so I offer another possibility; maybe the teachers felt that they were doing their jobs, and this was all that I was capable of. The latter would seem highly unlikely, though, if anyone were to sit in on an Oneonta Middle School classroom. On to high school I went, headed on a backward path toward illiteracy.
My first year in high school things actually began to turn around. My Englsih teacher was a friend of my parents, and like them, she loved the language we speak. Mrs. Hardison showed interest in me, and made me feel like someone with a future beyond high school. When I was there she let me know when I did things well, and this made me want to do more. When I made mistakes, she was there to fix them and guide me in the right direction. In this year, I was doing what my parents hoped of me. It seems mostly trivial to talk about ninth grade because over the next three I managed to forget what I had learned due to bad teachers and lack of interest on my part. The downward spiral in literacy soon began.
There was really no reason why I should have such negative memories of these academic years. I could have made more of them outside of school, or even worked hard enough in my classes to be placed in advanced ones. The simple fact is that without the motivation I knew from home provided by my teacher I do not perform at a high level. Not only were my grades at a level far lower than what I was capable of, but I also began to look negatively at school. It is obvious that most kids “hate” high school, or at least say they do, and I think this is something that comes with the age. The difference in my case was that my teachers seemed to be right there with me, even fueling my negative feelings. Countless times I heard phrases like, “Is it Friday yet?” or “Do I have to teach today?” One positive influence from a teacher in the next few years could have changed my outlook on my education entirely. Instead of focusing on school, I just tried to have fun.
I have so many memories of the last three years of high school, and most of them do not take place in an educational setting. I had a lot of fun but did not learn what I should have. I can remember goofing around in the library when I could have been reading, roaming the hallways laughing and joking with friends when I should have been in class, and finally, when everything culminated in being awarded the “Worst Case of Senioritis” for our senior class. I was carefree and fun, and this I do not regret. All of the fun I was having should have been mixed with some form of education.
At some point during these three years I should have seriously thought about what my parents were thinking. While they always expressed their opinions, they never wanted to judge my behavior and upset me, so I never really considered the disappointment they must have felt in my slacking off. I stress the words “seriously” and “really” because I know that in the back of my mind I did feel bad about my behavior. I was caught up in the moment. I felt too cool to look back and remember the little boy I was who loved to read books and speak like an adult. Somewhere I should have brought back these things. My English classes were not the venue.
To help illustrate my English classes over the three years, here are a few examples: in tenth grade our teacher took a well-deserved year off to stay at home with her newborn child, so we had a different substitute for each half of the year. The first was a long-time substitute who did not see the value in outside reading, so read To Kill a Mockingbird and Julius Caesar out loud to the class. She was replaced mid-year by a woman who had just graduated from college and had close to no experience with 10th graders; she swore at the class late in the fourth quarter of the year and was not welcomed back. In eleventh grade my teacher often lost things that he planned on assigning us, most likely because all were handwritten and photocopied, and gave each student fullcredit. In my senior year, and I must preface this is my favorite English class experience, my teacher simply gave me an A+ as a final average because it was the easy thing to do. I never understood this, but why would I complain?
Last semester was my first experience away at college, and I could not have been happier with the change in my instructors’ attitudes toward learning. My introductory writing class gave me the chance to express myself in writing for the first time in college. The response I received for my work was what I had desired for so long: the feeling gained when someone takes an interest in me and respects my work, something that I had not felt from anyone besides my parents and select teachers. The fact that I am not easily motivated when a teacher does not show interest is not a fair excuse for some of my actions, or inactions, in the past, but today I no longer face this problem. Now I am in an environment with professors who work hard to teach their students all that they should be learning. This, along with a newly gained maturity that lets me actually sit back and contemplate what my mom would think, pushes me to work to my potential. My parents’ hopes for me are coming true, even though it took far longer than expected. Literacy in my everyday life is more prevalent than ever, and there is no reason why this could change.